1050 Mobile Vs 1050 Ti Mobile
Price now 545$ Games supported 82% Price now 256$ Games supported 76% Comparing of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General operation parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base of operations clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of operation, but for precise assessment y'all have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Annotation that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Data on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a hereafter reckoner configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connexion slot and motorbus, if the video carte is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard. Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and apply a shared office of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information volition testify useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Not-gaming criterion operation comparison. Notation that overall criterion operation is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if y'all find some perceived inconsistencies, feel gratuitous to speak upward in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. This is probably the almost ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing iv divide benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being washed in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 criterion using 1280x1024 screen resolution. Information technology taxes the graphics card with 2 scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located inside a ocean cavern, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Fourth dimension Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one existence few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken transport, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite beingness washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in Jan 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 characteristic level x benchmark that was used for habitation PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Nighttime Raid. Benchmark coverage: 14% Benchmark coverage: 14% Burn Strike is a DirectX xi criterion for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery animate being seemingly fabricated of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic plenty graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: 14% Ice Tempest Graphics is an obsolete criterion, part of 3DMark suite. Water ice Tempest was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 characteristic level 9 to display a battle between ii space fleets virtually a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in Jan 2020, it is at present superseded by 3DMark Dark Raid. Criterion coverage: 8% Let's meet how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the boilerplate frames per second in a large set of popular games across dissimilar resolutions: +23.9% −23.9% +4.2% −4.2% +thirteen.3% −thirteen.three% +16.2% −16.2% +xv.seven% −xv.seven% +17.5% −17.v% +20.5% −20.five% +21.1% −21.1% +12.7% −12.7% +22.2% −22.2% +18.2% −xviii.ii% +23.three% −23.3% +eleven.4% −11.iv% +0% +0% +22.two% −22.2% +xiii.5% −13.5% +9.vi% −9.6% +0% +0% +42.9% −42.nine% +13.eight% −thirteen.8% +twenty.5% −20.v% +27.viii% −27.viii% +13.five% −13.5% +21.2% −21.two% +xv.2% −15.2% +16.2% −xvi.two% +eighteen.2% −eighteen.2% +16.7% −sixteen.7% +9.1% −9.1% +33.3% −33.3% +0% +0% +53.8% −53.eight% +11.5% −eleven.5% +23.8% −23.8% +12.5% −12.5% −30% +30% −150% +150% +0% +0% +33.three% −33.iii% +0% +0% +thirteen.3% −xiii.3% +186% −186% +53.8% −53.8% +ix.1% −9.one% +xviii.2% −eighteen.2% +33.3% −33.iii% Judging by the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical Urban center recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile since it shows better performance. Should you still take questions concerning pick between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Exercise you lot think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile from AMD is Radeon 680M, which is slower past 3% and lower past ix positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile: The nearest GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000), which is faster past 1% and higher by three positions in our rating. Compare Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more than options to consider. Here you can run into the user rating of the graphics cards, likewise as charge per unit them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a calibration of 1 to five: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a calibration of i to v: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or written report an fault or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS1050 Ti Mobile vs 1050 Mobile
General info
Place in performance rating 243 301 Value for money nine.97 13.99 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Pascal (2016−2021) GPU code name GP107 GP107B Market segment Laptop Laptop Release date iii January 2017 (5 years ago) three January 2017 (5 years ago) Price now $545 $256 Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 768 no information CUDA cores 768 640 Cadre clock speed 1290 MHz no information Boost clock speed 1620 MHz 1392 MHz Number of transistors iii,300 million three,300 1000000 Manufacturing process engineering 14 nm 14 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 75 Watt no data Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C 97 °C Texture make full rate 77.76 59.72 Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Laptop size large big Bus back up no data PCIe three.0 Interface PCIe iii.0 x16 PCIe three.0 x16 Memory
Memory blazon GDDR5 no information Maximum RAM corporeality iv GB no data Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Chip Memory clock speed 7 GB/s no data Retentiveness bandwidth 112 GB/s 112 GB/due south Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors No outputs DP 1.four, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI Multi monitor support no information + HDCP no information two.two G-SYNC support + + Technologies
GameStream no data + GPU Heave no data 3.0 Ansel + + API support
DirectX 12 (12_1) no data Shader Model half dozen.4 half-dozen.4 OpenGL 4.6 4.5 OpenCL 1.two no data Vulkan i.ii.131 1.2.131 CUDA + + Criterion performance
Overall score
Gaming performance
900p no data 73 Full HD 57 46 1440p 25 24 4K 17 15 Full Hard disk drive
Medium Preset
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 43 37 Battlefield 5 59 51 Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47 twoscore Far Cry 5 47 39 Far Cry New Dawn 46 38 Forza Horizon iv 62 55 Scarlet Dead Redemption 2 33 27 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39 33 Total Hard disk
Loftier Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37 30 Battlefield 5 49 44 Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33 33 Far Cry 5 44 36 Far Cry New Dawn 42 37 Forza Horizon 4 57 52 Metro Exodus 19 19 Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22 14 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33 29 The Witcher 3: Wild Chase 47 39 Full Hd
Ultra Preset
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 23 18 Battlefield 5 42 37 Far Cry 5 twoscore 33 Far Weep New Dawn 38 33 Forza Horizon 4 43 37 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26 22 1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21 xviii Metro Exodus 12 11 Red Dead Redemption 2 xx−22 14−xvi Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17 17 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 20−22 xiii Battlefield 5 29 26 Far Cry 5 26 21 Far Cry New Dawn 27 24 Forza Horizon 4 twenty−22 26 4K
Loftier Preset
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare four 10 Metro Exodus 7 7 Red Dead Redemption two 20−22 14−16 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8 8 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17 14−16 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22 7 Battleground five 20−22 13 Far Cry 5 12 11 Far Weep New Dawn thirteen 11 Forza Horizon four 20−22 fifteen Advantages and disadvantages
Functioning rating nineteen.86 14.97
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by AMD
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile by AMD
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000)
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1050-Ti-mobile-vs-GeForce-GTX-1050-mobile
0 Response to "1050 Mobile Vs 1050 Ti Mobile"
Post a Comment